Its a crazy time,with various "protected people groups" occassionally benefiting from being attacked or provoked or insulted,etc . Sometimes they NEED to make something happen to re-establish the narrative of certain people being the persecutors,& themselves the victims,or potential victims. We've already heard a few cases of this happening (which are barely publicized & quickly buried by the media because the media thrives on this narrative as well. Its possible the mosque was firebombed by the typical enemy (ie some angry people group or individual of such),but its also possible that one of their own did it to establish or re-establish the narrative of "innocent muslims" being persecuted for the acts of two rogue extremists (ie the san bernardino perpetrators). We must ask this question in every case these days. The media won't ask the question because they thrive on the narrative discussed above. I've been saying in the last few days that we keep hearing various muslims say they are afraid of backlash,but that I hadn't heard of any such backlash,name-calling,insults,graffiti,etc whatsoever. I was thinking its been amazingly calm and void of such in the aftermath of san berdu.I've been thinking the typical angry people group that the liberal media et al enjoy perpetualizing have shown themselves to be considerably calm & restrained. Maybe they're not such an angry out-of-control people group after all!? Thus we have to always ask in this day & age,did the protected people group persecute themselves for the sake of re-establishing the narrative the liberal media thrives upon. You might notice the media almost gleefully announcing the alleged firebombing of the mosque.
In this DAY & AGE OF VICTIMOLOGY,WE MUST ALWAYS ASK IF THEY FIREBOMBED THEMSELVES: "COACHELLA: Person of interest detained in mosque fire (UPDATE) The Press Enterprise"
http://m.pe.com/articles/fire-789021-mosque-coachella.html
